(continued from front)
And no, I'm not making this up. The 15-page complaint is
in my hands, filed by the San Francisco law firm of
Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May and assigned to district
judge Charles R. Breyer. It asks for unspecified damages
and legal costs from Smigel.
"In an attempt to harm the Sock Puppet's audience appeal
and market share, and to increase Triumph's popularity
through a public 'controversy' or 'scandal,' Defendant
(Smigel) has claimed on national television, the
Internet and in print media that Pets.com stole the idea
and creation for its Sock Puppet from Defendant and that
the Pets.com Sock Puppet is a 'rip-off' of Triumph," the
suit alleges.
Pets.com also believes that Triumph's attacks on its
mascot created "an undesirable, unwholesome and unsavory
mental association" with its Sock Puppet in the minds of
consumers.
Smigel through his friend Jeff Ross, the executive
producer of "Late Night" declined comment. But Ross,
upon hearing of the lawsuit, told TV Barn, "You want my
first comment? I think it's hysterical."
But another passage in the complaint suggests that this
is more than a stupid Pets.com trick. The plaintiff
alleges that Smigel "has threatened a lawsuit for
trademark infringement, unfair competition, trademark
dilution and tortious interference with contract
directly against Pets.com by letter sent to Pets.com in
California."
No one has made public a copy of Smigel's letter to
Pets.com but given his reputation for sometimes
over-the-edge comedy, one wonders if the pet-supply
people aren't mistaking a slam for slander.
Besides his occasional appearances on "Late Night,"
Smigel contributes a sharp-edged cartoon to "Saturday
Night Live." One of them, in 1997, mocked NBC's parent
company General Electric so mercilessly that "SNL's"
executive producer Lorne Michaels had it pulled when the
episode was repeated later in the season. But Michaels
never suggested he had legal motives for his action, and
afterward Smigel licensed the censored video to the
media watchdog FAIR, which used it as a premium to
new members.
Pets.com bases much of its case on appearances made last
month by Smigel and current "Late Night" head writer
Jonathan Groff on "The Daily Show," "Inside Edition" and
the New York Daily News Web site. On each of these, the
two men (and Triumph) claim that the Sock Puppet is a
pale copy of Triumph.
But judging from one of the segments airing on the
March 16 "Inside Edition" the allegations seem to
have been intended to be taken with a grain of salt.
Groff even jokes that Triumph is more upset about the
Pets.com TV ads than is Smigel.
Boosted by $57.8 million in financing from e-tailing
giant Amazon.com, Pets.com (ticker: IPET) is seeking to
dominate the online pet-supply business, even as many
analysts are saying the sector is due for a shakeout.
Pets.com collected just $5.8 million in its first year
of business while racking up losses of $61.8 million,
and has seen its stock price fall from $14 a share
(shortly after the company went public in February) to
its current level of $3.13 a share at the close of
trading Monday.
The slogan of Pets.com is "Because pets can't drive."
Our furry friends can't talk, either, or else they might
have a thing or two to say about this line from the
opening paragraph of Pets.com vs. Smigel: "The Pets.com
Sock Puppet was created to be the voice of pets and an
advocate of pets, expressing to pet owning families --
children and adults alike the way pets feel about a
wide variety of pet-related issues."
The Sock Puppet has already been a source of
controversy. Last month the New York Times reported that
shortly after the Walt Disney Co. bought a 5 percent
stake in Pets.com, the Sock Puppet started making
"guest" appearances on a number of Disney-owned media
outlets, including three affiliated with ABC's news
division: "Good Morning America" (where he sang to
co-host Diane Sawyer), "Nightline" and the Mr. Showbiz
Web site, which doubles as the entertainment page of
ABCNews.com.
Viewers were never told that Disney had a financial
stake in Pets.com. Nor, apparently, was the media: A
March 20 press release sent to TV Barn promoting the
Sock Puppet's appearance on Mr. Showbiz makes no mention
of Disney's investment.
This is not the first time individuals connected with
"Late Night" have been sued, either. During the show's
first season, a "Clutch Cargo" sketch featured
likenesses of celebrities Ted Danson and Whoopi Goldberg
following their "blackface" appearance at the Friars'
Club. But it wasn't Ted or Whoopi that got mad it was
comedian Red Buttons, whose name was mentioned during
the sketch. Buttons slapped $20 million lawsuits on
O'Brien, Michaels, Ross and the NBC network. A judge
later dismissed the cases.
Wouldn't the Pets.com lawsuit be a juicy target for
Groff and his writing team at "Late Night"? Of course,
said Ross but he'd have to consult NBC's legal eagles
first. The fact that only Smigel is named in the suit
may hinder the show from making fun of it.
Here are samples of Triumph's wisdom, taken from his
appearance at last year's NBC upfront presentation:
- On new NBC executive Garth Ancier's previous job at
the WB: "I've got worms in my stool that have shows on
the WB!"
- On the returning NBC comedy "Veronica's Closet": "Is
that poop still on the air? Are you kidding me? Whose
leg did Kirstie Alley have to hump to get that?"
- On network relations: "Oh yeah, the affiliates are
really happy with NBC! I read all about that
compensation thing. You guys are getting it doggy-style
from the network!" (Conan O'Brien: "You've got the wrong
idea, Triumph we're one big happy family at NBC."
Triumph: "Oh yeah, and I'm banging Lassie!")
Thanks to Jennifer Fine and the staff of the Los Angeles
Daily Journal for their assistance with this story.
Earlier:
Pets.com stock debut isn't a hit
Free
ride over for Super Bowl's dot-com advertisers